Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBell, Katy J.L.
dc.contributor.authorHayen, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorIrwig, Les
dc.contributor.authorHochberg, Marc C
dc.contributor.authorEnsrud, Kristine E
dc.contributor.authorCummings, Steven R
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Douglas C
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T00:49:20Z
dc.date.available2021-02-25T00:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2012en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24563
dc.description.abstractBiochemical markers of bone turnover have been proposed to monitor the response to bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis, but this requires true between-person differences in the response to therapy.. Using mixed models we analysed 3 annual measurements of two markers (bone alkaline phosphatise (BAP) and cross linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX)) from the Fracture Intervention Trial. We compared marker variation among women allocated to alendronate with that among women allocated to placebo to estimate how much variation was due to true between-person differences in response to treatment, and how much was due to random within-person fluctuations unrelated to treatment. For both markers we found that the mean effect of treatment differed by the baseline level of marker. After allowing for this and other effects, we found large true between-person differences in response to treatment for both markers, with a coefficient of variation for NTX of 25.1% and for BAP of 21.2%. However random within-person fluctuation was even larger, with a coefficient of variation for change in NTX of 42.5% and for change in BAP of 25.8%. Although repeated measurements have the potential to reduce within person variability, even triplicate baseline marker measurements resulted in an averaged value that was only within 30% of the true value with 95% certainty. In summary, although bone turn-over markers appear promising for monitoring between person differences in response to treatment, their use in clinical practice is currently limited by large random within-person variation.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Bone and Mineral Researchen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectosteoporosisen_AU
dc.subjectBisphosphonates, treatmentsen_AU
dc.subjectepidemiologyen_AU
dc.titleThe potential value of monitoring bone turnover markers among women on alendronateen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciencesen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbmr.525
dc.rights.otherThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: "The potential value of monitoring bone turnover markers among women on alendronate. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 27(1):195-201. 2012", which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.525. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.citation.volume27en_AU
usyd.citation.issue1en_AU
usyd.citation.spage195en_AU
usyd.citation.epage201en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.