Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKeall, Paul
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Doan Trang
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Ricky
dc.contributor.authorHewson, Emily
dc.contributor.authorBall, Helen
dc.contributor.authorPoulsen, Per
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorGreer, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Perry
dc.contributor.authorWilton, Lee
dc.contributor.authorBromley, Regina
dc.contributor.authorKipritidis, John
dc.contributor.authorEade, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorKneebone, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorHruby, George
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Trevor
dc.contributor.authorHayden, Amy
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorArumugam, Sankar
dc.contributor.authorSidhom, Mark
dc.contributor.authorHarcastle, Nick
dc.contributor.authorSiva, Shankar
dc.contributor.authorTai, Keen-Hun
dc.contributor.authorGebski, Val
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jarad
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T05:45:46Z
dc.date.available2021-01-13T05:45:46Z
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24298
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (KIM) is a novel software platform implemented on standard radiation therapy systems and enabling real-time image guided radiation therapy (IGRT). In a multi-institutional prospective trial, we investigated whether real-time IGRT improved the accuracy of the dose patients with prostate cancer received during radiation therapy. Methods and materials: Forty-eight patients with prostate cancer were treated with KIM-guided SABR with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. During KIM-guided treatment, the prostate motion was corrected for by either beam gating with couch shifts or multileaf collimator tracking. A dose reconstruction method was used to evaluate the dose delivered to the target and organs at risk with and without real-time IGRT. Primary outcome was the effect of real-time IGRT on dose distributions. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes and toxicity. Results: Motion correction occurred in ≥1 treatment for 88% of patients (42 of 48) and 51% of treatments (121 of 235). With real-time IGRT, no treatments had prostate clinical target volume (CTV) D98% dose 5% less than planned. Without real-time IGRT, 13 treatments (5.5%) had prostate CTV D98% doses 5% less than planned. The prostate CTV D98% dose with real-time IGRT was closer to the plan by an average of 1.0% (range, -2.8% to 20.3%). Patient outcomes showed no change in the 12-month patient-reported outcomes compared with baseline and no grade ≥3 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities. Conclusions: Real-time IGRT is clinically effective for prostate cancer SABR.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Jounral of Radiation Oncology, Bioogy, Physicsen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectimage-guided radiation therapyen
dc.titleReal-Time Image Guided Ablative Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: Results From the TROG 15.01 SPARK Trialen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc0299 Other Physical Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.014
dc.relation.nhmrc1112096
dc.relation.other1081534
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen
usyd.departmentCentral Clinical Schoolen
usyd.citation.volume107en
usyd.citation.issue3en
usyd.citation.spage530en
usyd.citation.epage538en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.