Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeach, Andrewen
dc.contributor.authorStickells, Leeen
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-14
dc.date.available2020-08-14
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/23094
dc.description.abstractDistance is both conceptual and actual. It is overcome or exploited in all manner of ways that have consequences for the history of architecture. It is fostered in the critical attitude. And collapsed when history is invoked in the present. It shapes the relationship of Europe to its Antipodes, as well as of Europe to its neighbours. Its presence is necessary for claims upon disciplinarity; its absence, the dissolution of disciplinary boundaries. In what ways has distance figured in the history of architecture? What has it altered? What has it prevented? What has it allowed? What does it permit, even now? These lines opened the call for papers for Distance Looks Back, the first combined meeting of the EAHN and SAHANZ (Sydney, 10-13 July 2019, http://distance2019.sydney). This meeting served, first, to break down the distance that keeps the activities of these two highly compatible communities at a remove from one another. It also served to explore the very idea of distance as a practical consideration of the architectural historian’s work and as a persistent theme in architectural history and its conceptualisation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOtheren
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleLooking Back at Distance Looks Back: Reflections on the First Combined Meeting of EAHN and SAHANZ (Sydney, 10–13 July 2019)en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/ah.515
usyd.facultySydney School of Architecture, Design and Planningen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.