Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLavrencic, L
dc.contributor.authorBennett, H
dc.contributor.authorDaylight, G
dc.contributor.authorDraper, B
dc.contributor.authorCumming, R
dc.contributor.authorMack, H
dc.contributor.authorGarvey, G
dc.contributor.authorLasschuit, D
dc.contributor.authorHill, Y
dc.contributor.authorChalkley, S
dc.contributor.authorDelbaere, K
dc.contributor.authorBroe, G
dc.contributor.authorRadford, K
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-13
dc.date.available2020-07-13
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/22857
dc.description.abstractObjective: The prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment is higher in Aboriginal Australians compared to the national population, increasing the need to understand cognitive impairment in this at-risk population. This article reports normative data for a range of commonly used cognitive tests, in a population-based small normative sample of older Aboriginal Australians living in urban/regional New South Wales. Method: Participants included a representative random sample of community-dwelling older adults (60 years and older) with no cognitive impairment (n= 31),mild cognitive impairment (MCI;n= 38), or dementia diagnosis (n= 35), all from the Koori Growing Old Well Study. Cognitive tests included the Adden-brooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R), Digit Span (Forward and Back-ward), Logical Memory, and the Oral Trail Making Test (A and B). Results: Descriptive statistics and percentile scores for each test were reported for the normative sample. Comparison of performance between the diagnostic groups showed significant differences between the groups on most cognitive tests. The control group consistently performed better than the dementia group; and better than the MCI group on all tests, except for simple attention and sequencing tasks (Digit Span Forward and Oral Trail Making A). The MCI group also scored better than the dementia group on all tests, except for the Logical Memory Recognition task. Conclusion: Results support the utility of these cognitive tests that are commonly used in clinical and research settings, and demonstrate that these tests can discriminate between diagnostic groups in Aboriginal Australians. The normative data provided will enhance cognitive assessment of individuals within this population.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Psychologyen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectAboriginal Australiansen
dc.subjectdementiaen
dc.subjectIndigenous Australiansen
dc.subjectmild cognitive impairmenten
dc.subjectpublic healthen
dc.titleCognitive test norms and comparison between healthy ageing, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: A population-based study of older Aboriginal Australiansen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajpy.12241
dc.relation.arcCE170100005
dc.relation.nhmrc1105106510347
dc.relation.otherNHMRC-ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship: 1103312
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.volume71en
usyd.citation.issue3en
usyd.citation.spage249en
usyd.citation.epage260en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.