Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLavrencic, L
dc.contributor.authorBennett, H
dc.contributor.authorDaylight, G
dc.contributor.authorDraper, B
dc.contributor.authorCumming, R
dc.contributor.authorMack, H
dc.contributor.authorGarvey, G
dc.contributor.authorLasschuit, D
dc.contributor.authorHill, Y
dc.contributor.authorChalkley, S
dc.contributor.authorDelbaere, K
dc.contributor.authorBroe, G
dc.contributor.authorRadford, K
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-13
dc.date.available2020-07-13
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/22857
dc.description.abstractObjective: The prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment is higher in Aboriginal Australians compared to the national population, increasing the need to understand cognitive impairment in this at-risk population. This article reports normative data for a range of commonly used cognitive tests, in a population-based small normative sample of older Aboriginal Australians living in urban/regional New South Wales. Method: Participants included a representative random sample of community-dwelling older adults (60 years and older) with no cognitive impairment (n= 31),mild cognitive impairment (MCI;n= 38), or dementia diagnosis (n= 35), all from the Koori Growing Old Well Study. Cognitive tests included the Adden-brooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R), Digit Span (Forward and Back-ward), Logical Memory, and the Oral Trail Making Test (A and B). Results: Descriptive statistics and percentile scores for each test were reported for the normative sample. Comparison of performance between the diagnostic groups showed significant differences between the groups on most cognitive tests. The control group consistently performed better than the dementia group; and better than the MCI group on all tests, except for simple attention and sequencing tasks (Digit Span Forward and Oral Trail Making A). The MCI group also scored better than the dementia group on all tests, except for the Logical Memory Recognition task. Conclusion: Results support the utility of these cognitive tests that are commonly used in clinical and research settings, and demonstrate that these tests can discriminate between diagnostic groups in Aboriginal Australians. The normative data provided will enhance cognitive assessment of individuals within this population.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Psychologyen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectAboriginal Australiansen_AU
dc.subjectdementiaen_AU
dc.subjectIndigenous Australiansen_AU
dc.subjectmild cognitive impairmenten_AU
dc.subjectpublic healthen_AU
dc.titleCognitive test norms and comparison between healthy ageing, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: A population-based study of older Aboriginal Australiansen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajpy.12241
dc.relation.arcCE170100005
dc.relation.nhmrc1105106510347
dc.relation.otherNHMRC-ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship: 1103312
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.citation.volume71en_AU
usyd.citation.issue3en_AU
usyd.citation.spage249en_AU
usyd.citation.epage260en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.