Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, SC
dc.contributor.authorTunnicliffe, David J
dc.contributor.authorSingh-Grewal, D
dc.contributor.authorMavridis, D
dc.contributor.authorTonelli, M
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, DW
dc.contributor.authorCraig, JC
dc.contributor.authorTong, A
dc.contributor.authorStrippoli, GFM
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-16
dc.date.available2019-10-16
dc.date.issued2017-03-01
dc.identifier.citationPalmer SC,* Tunnicliffe DJ, Singh-Grewal, Mavridis D, Tonelli M, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Tong A, Strippoli GFM. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: Network meta-analysis. American Journal of Kidney Disease. 2017; 70(3):324-336.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/21226
dc.description.abstractBackground: Intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide has been first-line treatment for inducing disease remission in lupus nephritis. The comparative efficacy and toxicity of newer agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitors are uncertain. Study Design: Network meta-analysis. Setting & Population: Patients with proliferative lupus nephritis. Selection Criteria for Studies: Randomized trials of immunosuppression to induce or maintain disease remission. Interventions: IV cyclophosphamide, oral cyclophosphamide, MMF, calcineurin inhibitor, plasma exchange, rituximab, or azathioprine, alone or in combination. Outcomes: Complete remission, end-stage kidney disease, all-cause mortality, doubling of serum creatinine level, relapse, and adverse events. Results: 53 studies involving 4,222 participants were eligible. Induction and maintenance treatments were administered for 12 (IQR, 6-84) and 25 (IQR, 12-48) months, respectively. There was no evidence of different effects between therapies on all-cause mortality, doubling of serum creatinine level, or end-stage kidney disease. Compared to IV cyclophosphamide, the most effective treatments to induce remission in moderate to high-quality evidence were combined MMF and calcineurin inhibitor therapy, calcineurin inhibitors, and MMF (ORs were 2.69 [95% CI, 1.74-4.16], 1.86 [95% CI, 1.05-3.30], and 1.54 [95% CI, 1.04-2.30], respectively). MMF was significantly less likely than IV cyclophosphamide to cause alopecia (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.12-0.36), and MMF combined with calcineurin inhibitor therapy was less likely to cause ovarian failure (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.93). Regimens generally had similar odds of major infection. MMF was the most effective strategy to maintain remission. Limitations: Outcome definitions not standardized, short duration of follow-up, and possible confounding by previous or subsequent therapy. Conclusions: Evidence for induction therapy for lupus nephritis is inconclusive based on treatment effects on all-cause mortality, doubling of serum creatinine level, and end-stage kidney disease. MMF, calcineurin inhibitors, or their combination were most effective for inducing remission compared to IV cyclophosphamide, while conferring similar or lower treatment toxicity. MMF was the most effective maintenance therapy.en_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public Licenseen_US
dc.subjectLupus nephritisen_US
dc.subjectNetwork meta-analysisen_US
dc.titleInduction and Maintenance Immunosuppression Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trialsen_US
dc.typeArticle, Letteren_US
dc.subject.asrcFoR::110312 - Nephrology and Urologyen_US
dc.subject.asrcClinical Epidemiologyen_US
dc.type.pubtypePre-printen_US


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.