On interactions between alphaherpesviruses and natural killer cells
Access status:
Open Access
Type
ThesisThesis type
Doctor of PhilosophyAuthor/s
Campbell, Tessa MollieAbstract
Natural killer (NK) cells are a critical component of the innate immune response to viral infection. NK cells are responsible for the early control of virus spread, cytolytically killing infected cells, as well as secreting proinflammatory cytokines to enhance immune responses. In ...
See moreNatural killer (NK) cells are a critical component of the innate immune response to viral infection. NK cells are responsible for the early control of virus spread, cytolytically killing infected cells, as well as secreting proinflammatory cytokines to enhance immune responses. In patients with deficiencies in NK cell function, there is an extreme susceptibility to infection with herpesviruses, in particular, varicella zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). These two medically important human alphaherpesviruses cause widespread disease in human hosts, with VZV being the causative agent of varicella (chickenpox) and herpes zoster (shingles), while HSV-1 causes recurrent orolabial lesions (cold sores). Both viruses have the potential to cause severe complications, such as encephalitis and debilitating nerve pain. The vital role that NK cells play in controlling VZV and HSV-1 infections denotes an intricate struggle for dominance between virus and NK cell antiviral immunity; however, research in this area has remained surprisingly limited. This thesis explored the interactions between human NK cells and alphaherpesviruses, examining NK cell recognition of infected cells, as well as investigating viral infection of NK cells and manipulation of their function. Investigation into alphaherpesvirus interactions with NK cells first focused on examining whether VZV and HSV-1 modulated the surface of infected cells to potentially regulate NK cell recognition. In vitro co-culture of NK cells with VZV infected cells revealed that NK cells did not display enhanced activation in response to the infection, suggesting that specific viral mechanisms to limit NK cell detection may be at play. Delving into this, the expression of four specific ligands (MICA, ULBP1–3) recognised by the activating NK cell receptor, NKG2D, were examined during viral infection. Comparing VZV and HSV-1, differential patterns of regulation were found between the two viruses, as well as between distinct NKG2D ligands. Given that VZV appeared to be evading NK cell recognition, the research focus then turned to investigating how VZV directly interacted with NK cells. VZV is established as a lymphotropic virus, using the infection of immune cells to disseminate virus around the body, however it has so far remained unknown whether NK cells are permissive to VZV infection. Examination of human peripheral blood NK cells revealed that VZV productively infected NK cells, facilitating transmission of infectious virus to other cells in culture. VZV preferentially infected mature NK cell populations, as well as modulating cell-surface expression of maturityassociated markers. Notably, VZV infection of NK cells led to upregulated expression of chemokine receptors implicated in trafficking to the skin, suggesting that NK cells may play a key role in VZV pathogenesis. As NK cells were permissive to productive VZV infection, the effect of VZV on NK cell function was then investigated. Assessing cytolytic function, it was found that co-culture with VZV lead to potent inhibition of NK cell responsiveness to target cell stimulation. Remarkably, not only were VZV infected NK cells impaired, but also NK cells exposed to virus were inhibited without needing to progress to full productive infection. HSV-1 had a similar capacity to paralyse NK cell cytolytic function, identifying a powerful immune evasion strategy shared by both alphaherpesviruses. In contrast, when NK cell cytokine responses were investigated, differential targeting of cytokine production was demonstrated between VZV and HSV-1. Overall, this thesis illuminates the complex interactions that occur between viral infection and the immune response. The findings presented in this thesis enhance our understanding of how viruses like VZV and HSV-1 are able to evade the immune system to establish lifelong infections, as well as furthering our understanding of how viruses can shape and manipulate the immune response.
See less
See moreNatural killer (NK) cells are a critical component of the innate immune response to viral infection. NK cells are responsible for the early control of virus spread, cytolytically killing infected cells, as well as secreting proinflammatory cytokines to enhance immune responses. In patients with deficiencies in NK cell function, there is an extreme susceptibility to infection with herpesviruses, in particular, varicella zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). These two medically important human alphaherpesviruses cause widespread disease in human hosts, with VZV being the causative agent of varicella (chickenpox) and herpes zoster (shingles), while HSV-1 causes recurrent orolabial lesions (cold sores). Both viruses have the potential to cause severe complications, such as encephalitis and debilitating nerve pain. The vital role that NK cells play in controlling VZV and HSV-1 infections denotes an intricate struggle for dominance between virus and NK cell antiviral immunity; however, research in this area has remained surprisingly limited. This thesis explored the interactions between human NK cells and alphaherpesviruses, examining NK cell recognition of infected cells, as well as investigating viral infection of NK cells and manipulation of their function. Investigation into alphaherpesvirus interactions with NK cells first focused on examining whether VZV and HSV-1 modulated the surface of infected cells to potentially regulate NK cell recognition. In vitro co-culture of NK cells with VZV infected cells revealed that NK cells did not display enhanced activation in response to the infection, suggesting that specific viral mechanisms to limit NK cell detection may be at play. Delving into this, the expression of four specific ligands (MICA, ULBP1–3) recognised by the activating NK cell receptor, NKG2D, were examined during viral infection. Comparing VZV and HSV-1, differential patterns of regulation were found between the two viruses, as well as between distinct NKG2D ligands. Given that VZV appeared to be evading NK cell recognition, the research focus then turned to investigating how VZV directly interacted with NK cells. VZV is established as a lymphotropic virus, using the infection of immune cells to disseminate virus around the body, however it has so far remained unknown whether NK cells are permissive to VZV infection. Examination of human peripheral blood NK cells revealed that VZV productively infected NK cells, facilitating transmission of infectious virus to other cells in culture. VZV preferentially infected mature NK cell populations, as well as modulating cell-surface expression of maturityassociated markers. Notably, VZV infection of NK cells led to upregulated expression of chemokine receptors implicated in trafficking to the skin, suggesting that NK cells may play a key role in VZV pathogenesis. As NK cells were permissive to productive VZV infection, the effect of VZV on NK cell function was then investigated. Assessing cytolytic function, it was found that co-culture with VZV lead to potent inhibition of NK cell responsiveness to target cell stimulation. Remarkably, not only were VZV infected NK cells impaired, but also NK cells exposed to virus were inhibited without needing to progress to full productive infection. HSV-1 had a similar capacity to paralyse NK cell cytolytic function, identifying a powerful immune evasion strategy shared by both alphaherpesviruses. In contrast, when NK cell cytokine responses were investigated, differential targeting of cytokine production was demonstrated between VZV and HSV-1. Overall, this thesis illuminates the complex interactions that occur between viral infection and the immune response. The findings presented in this thesis enhance our understanding of how viruses like VZV and HSV-1 are able to evade the immune system to establish lifelong infections, as well as furthering our understanding of how viruses can shape and manipulate the immune response.
See less
Date
2018-10-19Licence
The author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.Faculty/School
Faculty of Medicine and HealthAwarding institution
The University of SydneyShare