Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDouble, Kit Spenser
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-17
dc.date.available2018-07-17
dc.date.issued2018-04-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/18588
dc.descriptionIncludes publicationsen_AU
dc.description.abstractConfidence ratings are one of the most frequently used measures of metacognition. Is has traditionally been assumed that confidence ratings can be elicited from individuals without affecting their underlying cognitive and metacognitive processes. Recently, research has challenged this assumption by demonstrating changes in cognitive performance in reaction to providing self-report measures of metacognition, so-called reactivity. The purpose of this thesis was to extend these findings by examining reactivity to confidence ratings in reasoning and problem-solving tasks. After introducing theory relevant to metacognition and reactivity in Chapter 1, Chapter 2 provides a meta-analysis of reactivity to judgements of learning. This meta-analysis indicated that positive reactivity (a facilitation of cognitive performance) occurs in response to related, but not unrelated word-pairs. Chapter 3 presents one of the first empirical studies of reactivity to confidence ratings, demonstrating that confidence ratings benefit performance on an IQ test, but reactivity is moderated by trait-like self-confidence. In Chapter 4 the effect of eliciting confidence ratings on metacognitive monitoring and control is examined. The results show that collecting confidence ratings impairs metacognitive monitoring. Additionally, metacognitive control is affected, in that confidence ratings prompt participants to focus on short-term performance, rather than long-term performance. Chapter 5 shows that the word ‘confident’ may prime pre-existing beliefs about one’s competence, which results in reactivity effects. Finally, Chapter 6 evaluates reactivity to prospective confidence ratings. The results indicate that eliciting prospective confidence ratings facilitates performance on a cognitive task. Implications for the measurements of metacognition and the use of confidence ratings in research, as well as the potential use of confidence ratings as an educational intervention are discussed in Chapter 7.en_AU
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
dc.subjectMetacognitionen_AU
dc.subjectreactivityen_AU
dc.subjectconfidence ratingsen_AU
dc.subjectreasoningen_AU
dc.subjectintelligenceen_AU
dc.titleReactivity to Confidence Ratings During Reasoning and Problem Solvingen_AU
dc.typeThesisen_AU
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
usyd.facultyFaculty of Science, School of Psychologyen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.