Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Simon
dc.contributor.authorAlpers, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-21
dc.date.available2018-05-21
dc.date.issued2018-05-19
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/18216
dc.description.abstractWe reply to criticisms made by prominent anti-gun control researcher Gary Kleck of our widely reported 2016 study on the impact of Australia’s historic 1996 gun law reforms on mass shootings and firearm-related deaths. Thirteen mass fatal shootings in 18 years were followed by 22 years with no such incidents, with the probability of this being a chance occurrence calculated at 1:200,000 against. We concentrate on Kleck’s efforts to repudiate our conclusions by redefining mass shootings; his argument that mass shooters do not maximise the lethal potential of their semi-automatic weapons and so could just as well use (legal) single shot firearms; and that when mass shooters move about in their shooting locations, such events are improperly classified as mass shootings, rather than “sprees”.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectFirearmsen_AU
dc.subjectGun Controlen_AU
dc.subjectLegislationen_AU
dc.subjectMass shootingsen_AU
dc.subjectAustraliaen_AU
dc.subjectPort Arthuren_AU
dc.titleAustralia’s 1996 gun law reforms halted mass shootings for 22 years: a response to criticism from Gary Klecken_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrcFoR::160504 - Crime Policyen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePre-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.