Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Simon
dc.contributor.authorAlpers, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-21
dc.date.available2018-05-21
dc.date.issued2018-05-19
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/18216
dc.description.abstractWe reply to criticisms made by prominent anti-gun control researcher Gary Kleck of our widely reported 2016 study on the impact of Australia’s historic 1996 gun law reforms on mass shootings and firearm-related deaths. Thirteen mass fatal shootings in 18 years were followed by 22 years with no such incidents, with the probability of this being a chance occurrence calculated at 1:200,000 against. We concentrate on Kleck’s efforts to repudiate our conclusions by redefining mass shootings; his argument that mass shooters do not maximise the lethal potential of their semi-automatic weapons and so could just as well use (legal) single shot firearms; and that when mass shooters move about in their shooting locations, such events are improperly classified as mass shootings, rather than “sprees”.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectFirearmsen
dc.subjectGun Controlen
dc.subjectLegislationen
dc.subjectMass shootingsen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectPort Arthuren
dc.titleAustralia’s 1996 gun law reforms halted mass shootings for 22 years: a response to criticism from Gary Klecken
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrcFoR::160504 - Crime Policyen
dc.type.pubtypePre-printen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.