Re-setting the relationship: why we need constitutional change

Anderson AO, Pat

Access status:

Open Access

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Anderson AO, Pat
dc.date.accessioned	2017-10-27
dc.date.available	2017-10-27
dc.date.issued	2017-10-27
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2123/17336
dc.description	Now, fifty years on from that Referendum, there is another opportunity for genuine and substantive reform to the Australian Constitution. Ms Anderson describes her recent work as a member of the Referendum Council, and her experience of the unique regional Dialogues, culminating in the National Convention of First peoples at Uluru in May this year, and the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Ms Anderson tells how these forums overwhelmingly endorsed substantive change to empower Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to take their rightful place in the country. In particular, she examines one of the key demands to emerge from the Dialogues and from Uluru, namely amending the constitution to establish a permanent representative body that would give First Nations a Voice directly to the Federal Parliament.	en
dc.description.abstract	Pat Anderson reflects on the contribution that Dr Perkins made to the struggle for social justice and Aboriginal rights in Australia, including his part in advocating a ‘Yes’ vote in the 1967 Referendum.	en
dc.language.iso	en_AU	en
dc.rights	Other	en
dc.subject	Oration	en
dc.subject	Charles Perkins	en
dc.subject	Presentation	en
dc.subject	Panel discussion	en
dc.subject	Annual Memorial Oration	en
dc.subject	Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander	en
dc.subject	Indigenous	en
dc.subject	Constitutional change	en
dc.subject	Constitutional reform	en
dc.subject	Uluru statement	en
dc.subject	Aboriginal affairs	en
dc.subject	Aboriginal rights	en
dc.title	Re-setting the relationship: why we need constitutional change	en
dc.type	Audiovisual	en
dc.type.pubtype	Publisher version	en
usyd.faculty	Indigenous Strategy and Services, Wingara Mura Collection (Koori Centre)