Recruiting general practitioners as participants for qualitative and experimental primary care studies in Australia
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | McKinn, Shannon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bonner, Carissa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jansen, Jesse | |
| dc.contributor.author | McCaffery, Kirsten | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-21 | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-07-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | McKinn S, Bonner C, Jansen J, McCaffery K (2014) Recruiting general practitioners as participants for qualitative and experimental primary care studies in Australia. Australian Journal of Primary Health 21(3), 354-359 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.publish.csiro.au/PY/PY14068 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2123/16390 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Recruiting general practitioners (GPs) for participation in primary care research is vitally important, but it can be very difficult for researchers to engage time-poor GPs. This paper describes six different strategies used by a research team recruiting Australian GPs for three qualitative interview studies and one experimental study, and reports the response rates and costs incurred. Strategies included: (1) mailed invitations via Divisions of General Practice; (2) electronic newsletters; (3) combining mailed invitations and newsletter; (4) in-person recruitment at GP conferences; (5) conference satchel inserts; and (6) combining in-person recruitment and satchel inserts. Response rates ranged from 0 (newsletter) to 30% (in-person recruitment). Recruitment costs per participant ranged from A$83 (in-person recruitment) to A$232 (satchel inserts). Mailed invitations can be viable for qualitative studies, especially when free/low-cost mailing lists are used, if the response rate is less important. In-person recruitment at GP conferences can be effective for short quantitative studies, where a higher response rate is important. Newsletters and conference satchel inserts were expensive and ineffective. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_AU | en |
| dc.publisher | CSIRO Publishing | en |
| dc.rights | Other | |
| dc.subject | cardiovascular disease | en |
| dc.subject | general practice | en |
| dc.subject | study recruitment | en |
| dc.subject | study methods | en |
| dc.title | Recruiting general practitioners as participants for qualitative and experimental primary care studies in Australia | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.subject.asrc | FoR::111799 - Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 101.1071/PY14068 | |
| dc.type.pubtype | Author accepted manuscript | en |
| usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health | en |
Associated file/s
Associated collections