Place-attachment in heritage theory and practice: a personal and ethnographic study
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Brown, Stephen Hepburn | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-29 | |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08-28 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2123/15976 | |
dc.description.abstract | The thesis is a critical study of the concept of place-attachment in Australian heritage practice and its application in this field. Place-attachment is typically characterised as a form of intangible heritage arising from interactions between people and place. I trace how this meaning borrows from concepts in psychology and geography and argue that the idea of place-attachment is often applied uncritically in heritage conservation because the field lacks a body of discipline-specific theory. It is my thesis that place-attachment can be conceptualised in a way that is more amenable to effective heritage management practice than is currently the case. I construct a concept of place-attachment that draws on a notion of intra-action and theories of attachment, agency and affect. I define place-attachment as a distributed phenomenon that emerges through the entanglements of individuals or groups, places and things. This meaning is interrogated via four case studies – each centred on a home and garden (including my own) and Anglo-Australians – by applying a methodology that is primarily self-referential and auto-ethnographic. Topics that emerge from the field data, including life stages (i.e., childhood-adulthood attachment), generational transfer, and experiential understanding or empathy, are examined and shown to offer support for a concept of place-attachment as entanglement. The thesis findings have implications for heritage practice. A framework of entanglement over interaction calls for recognition of intra-active assemblages in preference to intangible meanings; dynamism and multi-temporality over stasis and a distant past; the power of personal heritage alongside authorised, collective forms; and situated, relational ethics together with place-centred values. | en_AU |
dc.subject | place-attachment | en_AU |
dc.subject | belonging | en_AU |
dc.subject | heritage | en_AU |
dc.subject | entanglement | en_AU |
dc.subject | garden | en_AU |
dc.subject | narrative | en_AU |
dc.title | Place-attachment in heritage theory and practice: a personal and ethnographic study | en_AU |
dc.type | Thesis | en_AU |
dc.date.valid | 2014-01-01 | en_AU |
dc.type.thesis | Doctor of Philosophy | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry | en_AU |
usyd.department | Department of Archaeology | en_AU |
usyd.degree | Doctor of Philosophy Ph.D. | en_AU |
usyd.awardinginst | The University of Sydney | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections