Diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.
Access status:
Open Access
Type
ArticleAbstract
Objectives: Management of SLE is complex and variability in practices exists. Guidelines have been developed to help improve the management of SLE patients but there has been no formal evaluation of these guidelines. This study aims to compare the scope, quality and consistency of ...
See moreObjectives: Management of SLE is complex and variability in practices exists. Guidelines have been developed to help improve the management of SLE patients but there has been no formal evaluation of these guidelines. This study aims to compare the scope, quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Electronic databases were searched up to April 2014. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument and textual synthesis was used to appraise and compare recommendations. Results: Nine clinical practice guidelines and five consensus statements were identified, which covered seven topics: diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, neuropsychiatric SLE, lupus nephritis, anti-phospholipid syndrome and other manifestations of lupus. The methodological quality of the guidelines was variable, with the overall mean AGREE II scores ranging from 31% to 75% out of a maximum 100%. Scores were consistently low for applicability, with only one guideline scoring above 50%. There was substantial variability in the treatments recommended for class II and V lupus nephritis, the recommended duration of maintenance therapy for class III/IV lupus nephritis (from 1 to 4 years), and timing of ophthalmological examination for patients on corticosteroids. Conclusion: Published guidelines on SLE cover a complex area of clinical care but the methodological quality, scope and recommendations varied substantially. Collaborative and multidisciplinary efforts to develop comprehensive, high-quality evidence-based guidelines are needed to promote best treatment and health outcomes for patients with SLE.
See less
See moreObjectives: Management of SLE is complex and variability in practices exists. Guidelines have been developed to help improve the management of SLE patients but there has been no formal evaluation of these guidelines. This study aims to compare the scope, quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Electronic databases were searched up to April 2014. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument and textual synthesis was used to appraise and compare recommendations. Results: Nine clinical practice guidelines and five consensus statements were identified, which covered seven topics: diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, neuropsychiatric SLE, lupus nephritis, anti-phospholipid syndrome and other manifestations of lupus. The methodological quality of the guidelines was variable, with the overall mean AGREE II scores ranging from 31% to 75% out of a maximum 100%. Scores were consistently low for applicability, with only one guideline scoring above 50%. There was substantial variability in the treatments recommended for class II and V lupus nephritis, the recommended duration of maintenance therapy for class III/IV lupus nephritis (from 1 to 4 years), and timing of ophthalmological examination for patients on corticosteroids. Conclusion: Published guidelines on SLE cover a complex area of clinical care but the methodological quality, scope and recommendations varied substantially. Collaborative and multidisciplinary efforts to develop comprehensive, high-quality evidence-based guidelines are needed to promote best treatment and health outcomes for patients with SLE.
See less
Date
2015-10-01Publisher
WileyLicence
This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: FULL CITE, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.22591/abstract;jsessionid=9C5EA21F086D0D05E72CE992BC48E104.f03t03Citation
1. Tunnicliffe DJ, Singh-Grewal D, Kim S, Craig JC, Tong A. Diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;30(10):1440-1452Share