Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDew, Angela
dc.contributor.authorBulkeley, Kim
dc.contributor.authorVeitch, Craig
dc.contributor.authorBundy, Anita
dc.contributor.authorLincoln, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorBrentnall, Jennie
dc.contributor.authorGallego, Gisselle
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Scott
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-03
dc.date.available2014-04-03
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/10265
dc.descriptionThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.comen
dc.description.abstractThere is a global movement for people with a disability towards personcentred practices with opportunities for self-determination and choice. Person-centred approaches may involve individual funding (IF) for the purchase of required support. A shift to a person-centred model and IF should allow people with a disability and their carers greater choice in therapy access. However, individuals who live in rural and remote areas have less choice and access to therapy services than their metropolitan counterparts. Drawing on data from a larger study into therapy service delivery in a rural and remote area of New South Wales, Australia, this study describes some benefits and barriers to using IF to access therapy services in rural areas. Ten carers and 60 service providers participated in audio-recorded focus groups and individual interviews during which IF was discussed. Transcribed data were analysed using thematic analysis and constant comparison. Greater access to and choice of therapy providers were identified as benefits of IF. Four barriers were identified: (i) lack of information and advice; (ii) limited local service options and capacity; (iii) higher costs and fewer services and (iv) complexity of self-managing packages. A range of strategies is required to address the barriers to using IF in rural and remote areas. Carers indicated a need for: accessible information; a local contact person for support and guidance; adequate financial compensation to offset additional travel expenses and coordinated eligibility and accountability systems. Service providers required: coordinated cross-sector approaches; local workforce planning to address therapist shortages; certainty around service viability and growth; clear policies and procedures around implementation of IF. This study highlights the need for further discussion and research about how to overcome the barriers to the optimal use of an IF model for those living in rural and remote areas.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.publisherHealth and Social Care in the Communityen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectdisabilityen
dc.subjectindividual fundingen
dc.subjectperson centreden
dc.subjectrural and remoteen
dc.subjectWobbly Huben
dc.subjectAllied healthen
dc.subjectcarersen
dc.subjectservice provideren
dc.subjectService Provisionen
dc.subjecttherapyen
dc.titleCarer and service providers’ experiences of individual funding models for children with a disability in rural and remote areasen
dc.typeArticleen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Centre for Disability Research and Policyen
usyd.departmentFaculty of Health Sciencesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.