Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStephens, Timen
dc.date.accessioned2006-03-28
dc.date.available2006-03-28
dc.date.issued2005-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/706
dc.description.abstractInternational environmental law is one of the most dynamic fields of public international law, and has rapidly acquired great breadth and sophistication. Yet the rate of global environmental decline has also increased and is accelerating. Halting and reversing this process is a challenge of effective governance, requiring institutions that can ensure that the now impressive body of environmental norms is faithfully implemented. This thesis explores whether and to what extent international courts and tribunals can play a useful role in international environmental regimes. Consideration is given to the threefold function of adjudication in resolving environmental disputes, in promoting compliance with environmental standards, and in developing environmental rules. The thesis is divided into three Parts. The first Part examines the spectrum of adjudicative bodies that have been involved in the resolution of environmental disputes, situates these within the evolution of institutions for compliance control, and offers a reassessment of their relevance in contemporary environmental governance. The second Part critically assesses the contribution that arbitral awards and judicial decisions have made to the development of norms and principles of environmental law, examining case law relating to transboundary pollution, shared freshwater resources and marine environmental protection. In the third Part of the thesis consideration is given to three looming challenges for international environmental litigation: accommodating greater levels of public participation in adjudicative processes, resolving practical problems stemming from the interaction among multiple jurisdictions, and ensuring that specialised courts and tribunals do not apply environmental norms in a parochial manner that privileges the policy objectives of issue-specific regimes.en
dc.format.extent251429 bytes
dc.format.extent2795358 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageenen
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.rightsOtheren
dc.subjectinternational law;international environment law;dispute settlement;international courtsen
dc.titleThe Role of International Courts and Tribunals in International Environmental Lawen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.date.valid2005-01-01en
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherCopyright Stephens, Tim;http://www.library.usyd.edu.au/copyright.htmlen
usyd.facultySydney Law Schoolen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.