Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLast, Stephanie Jane
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T04:30:09Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T04:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2022en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/29627
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is concerned with the complex and unsettling villain that emerges from the Victorian novel. Moving away from simplified, black and white conceptions of the ‘bad character’, the novel offers a nuanced, vivid, uncertain picture of villainy. Recent contributions to character studies usefully acknowledge that characters can be both human-like entities and integral cogs in the formal structures of narratives, yet the specific import of the villain character remains an intractable problem. This thesis offers a new intervention into the character debate by focusing on the intricacies the ‘villain effect’ – that is, what one character type, the villain, does to readers and what plot requires of it. It scrutinises the affective impact of the villain, alongside its imperative contributions to narrative configuration and explication, in the works of Charles Dickens, Charlotte and Emily Brontë, Anthony Trollope, Wilkie Collins, and Mary Elizabeth Braddon. Given its tendency to spark confused and conflicted feelings rather than straightforwardly negative ones, the villain offers a unique way to address the psychology of reading. The experience of reading the villain is bound up in a specific type of fervid attachment entrenched in both negative and positive affect. The conundrum this thesis investigates, therefore, is why the villain produces dynamic psychological responses in readers, involving an overflow of feeling and paradoxical reactions which are difficult to reconcile. I draw primarily on psychoanalytic methodologies, which are attuned to fixations and ambivalences, to work through these knotty, heightened responses. Among others, Sigmund Freud’s theory of the uncanny and Julia Kristeva’s notion of abjection help to explicate the villain’s uniquely uncomfortable hold on readers. Silvan Tomkins’s theory of primary affect offers another psychological angle, illuminating the more instinctive dimensions of reader response.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCharacteren_AU
dc.subjectvillainen_AU
dc.subjectpsychologyen_AU
dc.subjectaffecten_AU
dc.subjectreader responseen_AU
dc.subjectambivalenceen_AU
dc.titleReading the Villain: The Psychology of Character in the Victorian Novelen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Art, Communication and Englishen_AU
usyd.departmentDiscipline of Englishen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorSmith, Vanessa


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.