The Origins and Development of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for the Health Professions in Australia, 2005-2010
Access status:
USyd Access
Type
ThesisThesis type
Doctor of PhilosophyAuthor/s
Pacey, Fiona JaneAbstract
This study began in early 2010 in response to a dramatic change to Australian health workforce regulations that were due to be implemented on 1 July 2010. The new arrangements introduced consistent registration and accreditation requirements for ten professional groups that had ...
See moreThis study began in early 2010 in response to a dramatic change to Australian health workforce regulations that were due to be implemented on 1 July 2010. The new arrangements introduced consistent registration and accreditation requirements for ten professional groups that had previously been regulated separately across each of the country’s six states and two territories. The study led to four scholarly publications. The first publication described the origins of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme and mapped the development of its organisational arrangements. The second paper identified the unique nature of the Scheme’s governance arrangements through an examination of its organisational features and the scope of regulatory activity in comparison with other ‘national’ health regulatory agencies in Australia. The penultimate paper demonstrated that the Scheme is neither exclusively subservient to nor independent of the State but, rather, ‘quasi-independent’ in its governance arrangements. The fourth and final publication explicated the Scheme’s accountability arrangements in the context of Australia’s federal system of government. The data source for each contribution to knowledge was a case study based on analysis of key policy and implementation documents and interviews with key participants or stakeholders in the Scheme’s design and formulation. Overall, the thesis makes an original contribution to knowledge by identifying and explicating these unique organisational and regulatory arrangements. The significance of the study lies in the elucidation of these unique arrangements in the context of existing literature on health workforce regulation and associated governance arrangements.
See less
See moreThis study began in early 2010 in response to a dramatic change to Australian health workforce regulations that were due to be implemented on 1 July 2010. The new arrangements introduced consistent registration and accreditation requirements for ten professional groups that had previously been regulated separately across each of the country’s six states and two territories. The study led to four scholarly publications. The first publication described the origins of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme and mapped the development of its organisational arrangements. The second paper identified the unique nature of the Scheme’s governance arrangements through an examination of its organisational features and the scope of regulatory activity in comparison with other ‘national’ health regulatory agencies in Australia. The penultimate paper demonstrated that the Scheme is neither exclusively subservient to nor independent of the State but, rather, ‘quasi-independent’ in its governance arrangements. The fourth and final publication explicated the Scheme’s accountability arrangements in the context of Australia’s federal system of government. The data source for each contribution to knowledge was a case study based on analysis of key policy and implementation documents and interviews with key participants or stakeholders in the Scheme’s design and formulation. Overall, the thesis makes an original contribution to knowledge by identifying and explicating these unique organisational and regulatory arrangements. The significance of the study lies in the elucidation of these unique arrangements in the context of existing literature on health workforce regulation and associated governance arrangements.
See less
Date
2018-06-27Licence
The author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.Faculty/School
Faculty of Health SciencesDepartment, Discipline or Centre
Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in HealthAwarding institution
The University of SydneyShare