Supporting adults with lower literacy to engage in decisions about their health: Taking a health literacy approach
Access status:
USyd Access
Type
ThesisThesis type
Doctor of PhilosophyAuthor/s
Muscat, DanielleAbstract
Background: There are widespread calls for shared decision-making in healthcare among all sectors of the community. However, to date, there has been little attempt to address this in lower literacy populations. Aim: To investigate ways to train adults with lower literacy to be ...
See moreBackground: There are widespread calls for shared decision-making in healthcare among all sectors of the community. However, to date, there has been little attempt to address this in lower literacy populations. Aim: To investigate ways to train adults with lower literacy to be involved in decision-making about their treatment or care using an asset-based health literacy approach. Methods: Formative and summative evaluation of a novel shared decision-making training program designed for adults with lower literacy and delivered in Australian adult basic education settings. The program was evaluated using a matched cluster-randomised controlled trial with two qualitative sub-studies. Results: A total of 308 participants from 28 adult education classes were enrolled in the program. The majority of participants had limited health literacy and spoke a language other than English at home. The shared decision-making training program served two key functions; (i) it stimulated awareness among participants that patients have the right to be involved in decision-making concerning their treatment and care, (ii) it developed understanding and skills (numerical risk; shared decision-making terminology) for question-asking and decision-making. The content of the shared decision-making program was acceptable to learners and teachers, with teachers noting congruence in shared decision-making content and the institutional commitment to learner empowerment in adult education. Discussion: This thesis provides the first evidence of the potential impact shared decision-making training can have for adults with lower literacy, indicating that rigorously-developed, asset-based health literacy programs can facilitate knowledge and skill development and question-asking, and elucidate the right consumers have to be involved in decision-making.
See less
See moreBackground: There are widespread calls for shared decision-making in healthcare among all sectors of the community. However, to date, there has been little attempt to address this in lower literacy populations. Aim: To investigate ways to train adults with lower literacy to be involved in decision-making about their treatment or care using an asset-based health literacy approach. Methods: Formative and summative evaluation of a novel shared decision-making training program designed for adults with lower literacy and delivered in Australian adult basic education settings. The program was evaluated using a matched cluster-randomised controlled trial with two qualitative sub-studies. Results: A total of 308 participants from 28 adult education classes were enrolled in the program. The majority of participants had limited health literacy and spoke a language other than English at home. The shared decision-making training program served two key functions; (i) it stimulated awareness among participants that patients have the right to be involved in decision-making concerning their treatment and care, (ii) it developed understanding and skills (numerical risk; shared decision-making terminology) for question-asking and decision-making. The content of the shared decision-making program was acceptable to learners and teachers, with teachers noting congruence in shared decision-making content and the institutional commitment to learner empowerment in adult education. Discussion: This thesis provides the first evidence of the potential impact shared decision-making training can have for adults with lower literacy, indicating that rigorously-developed, asset-based health literacy programs can facilitate knowledge and skill development and question-asking, and elucidate the right consumers have to be involved in decision-making.
See less
Date
2017-08-25Licence
The author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.Faculty/School
Sydney Medical School, School of Public HealthAwarding institution
The University of SydneyShare