Patient Reported Outcomes From Clinical Trials in Medical Retina
Access status:
USyd Access
Type
ThesisThesis type
Masters by ResearchAuthor/s
Aroney, Christine MargaretAbstract
Purpose: To determine the patient-centred effectiveness of treatment with the slow release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) and intravitreal bevacizumab using the Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire (IVI), a vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) measure, in ...
See morePurpose: To determine the patient-centred effectiveness of treatment with the slow release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) and intravitreal bevacizumab using the Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire (IVI), a vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) measure, in patients with visual impairment secondary to centre-involving diabetic macular edema (DMO). Methods: Patients with DMO were enrolled in a phase 2, prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-masked clinical trial and received either DEX implant 4 monthly or bevacizumab monthly, both pro re nata. VRQoL was measured at baseline and 24 months, using the IVI’s three component scales, namely Reading, Mobility and Emotional Well-being. Rasch analysis was used to generate interval-level estimates of VRQoL, which were then analysed using t-tests to assess changes over time. Results: 48 patients completed the main study; 43 (90%) answered the IVI at the baseline and 24-month (final efficacy) visits. VRQoL improved significantly, with average increases of 1.44, 0.99 and 1.49 logits, for the Reading, Mobility and Emotional well-being scales respectively, from baseline to 24 months, (p<0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in improvement in VRQoL in the DEX implant only compared with the bevacizumab-only group, in any of the three scales listed above (with 1.41, 1.08 and 2.11 logits improvement, in Reading, Mobility and Emotional well-being respectively for DEX implant group, compared to 1.48, 1.06 and 2.11 for bevacizumab; p-values >0.1.) Conclusions: We found that both DEX implant and bevacizumab treatment result in significant and similar improvements in VRQoL in patients with DMO over a 24-month period.
See less
See morePurpose: To determine the patient-centred effectiveness of treatment with the slow release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) and intravitreal bevacizumab using the Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire (IVI), a vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) measure, in patients with visual impairment secondary to centre-involving diabetic macular edema (DMO). Methods: Patients with DMO were enrolled in a phase 2, prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-masked clinical trial and received either DEX implant 4 monthly or bevacizumab monthly, both pro re nata. VRQoL was measured at baseline and 24 months, using the IVI’s three component scales, namely Reading, Mobility and Emotional Well-being. Rasch analysis was used to generate interval-level estimates of VRQoL, which were then analysed using t-tests to assess changes over time. Results: 48 patients completed the main study; 43 (90%) answered the IVI at the baseline and 24-month (final efficacy) visits. VRQoL improved significantly, with average increases of 1.44, 0.99 and 1.49 logits, for the Reading, Mobility and Emotional well-being scales respectively, from baseline to 24 months, (p<0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in improvement in VRQoL in the DEX implant only compared with the bevacizumab-only group, in any of the three scales listed above (with 1.41, 1.08 and 2.11 logits improvement, in Reading, Mobility and Emotional well-being respectively for DEX implant group, compared to 1.48, 1.06 and 2.11 for bevacizumab; p-values >0.1.) Conclusions: We found that both DEX implant and bevacizumab treatment result in significant and similar improvements in VRQoL in patients with DMO over a 24-month period.
See less
Date
2016-06-30Licence
The author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.Faculty/School
Sydney Medical SchoolDepartment, Discipline or Centre
Department of Clinical Ophthalmology and Eye HealthAwarding institution
The University of SydneyShare