Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Kerridge, I. H., and K. R. Mitchell. "Missing the point: Rogers v Whitaker and the ethical ideal of informed and shared decision making." Journal of Law and Medicine 1 (1994): 237-244.||en_AU|
|dc.description.abstract||The High Court's judgment in Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 has belatedly recognised as persuasive the values and attitudes of particular patients in what constitutes for them a significant treatment risk. The importance now attached to these subjective patient factors was shown in the High Court's determination that physicians now have a duty to disclose and warn regarding material risks specific to the particular patient. It is our belief that the Rogers v Whitaker emphasis on the requirements for disclosure underscores much of the misinterpretation of consent as a single event or action rather than as an ever-present sequela of a process which informs decision-making. What is required is a shift in focus from disclosure to understanding and from unilateral information-transfer to the integrated process of shared and informed decision-making.||en_AU|
|dc.title||Missing the point: Rogers v Whitaker and the ethical ideal of informed and shared decision making||en_AU|
|Appears in Collections:||Research Papers and Publications. Sydney Health Ethics|
This work is protected by Copyright. All rights reserved. Access to this work is provided for the purposes of personal research and study. Except where permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, this work must not be copied or communicated to others without the express permission of the copyright owner. Use the persistent URI in this record to enable others to access this work.
|JLM missing the point.pdf||513.8 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in Sydney eScholarship Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.