<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>John Grill Institute of Project Leadership</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/32905" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/32905</id>
<updated>2026-06-19T10:05:30Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-06-19T10:05:30Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Renewable Energy Transitions: A Multi-Level Perspective of Electricity Policies in New South Wales</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/35065" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lee, Veronika</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Zhang, Sujuan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Tarboda, Louis</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/35065</id>
<updated>2026-04-28T02:43:41Z</updated>
<published>2026-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Renewable Energy Transitions: A Multi-Level Perspective of Electricity Policies in New South Wales
Lee, Veronika; Zhang, Sujuan; Tarboda, Louis
Australia has committed to an ambitious climate strategy, aiming to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 43 percent of 2005 levels by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050. This paper examines Australia's electricity generation sector, which is heavily reliant on coal and is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, contributing 34.3 percent to the total in 2024.
</summary>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Major Projects Collaboration Toolkit</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/34975" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>John Grill Institute for Project Leadership</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Institute for Collaborative Working Australia</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/34975</id>
<updated>2026-04-28T02:43:43Z</updated>
<published>2026-03-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Major Projects Collaboration Toolkit
John Grill Institute for Project Leadership; Institute for Collaborative Working Australia
The research is unambiguous - more collaborative organisations are better performing. &#13;
 &#13;
Our Major Projects Collaboration Toolkit is the product of a year-long engagement with industry experts and a deep dive into the research on the factors that enable positive collaboration.  &#13;
&#13;
Developed by the Major Projects Leadership Forum Collaboration Working Group alongside our colleagues at the Institute for Collaborative Working Australia, we are excited to publish this Toolkit to help project leaders embed collaborative behaviours within their projects and unleash the benefits.
</summary>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Assessing  Delivery Confidence of Digital Projects: Guidance for Independent Assurers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/33123" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Pollack, Julien</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Smith, Natalie</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hong, Wei-Ting</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/33123</id>
<updated>2026-04-28T02:43:43Z</updated>
<published>2024-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Assessing  Delivery Confidence of Digital Projects: Guidance for Independent Assurers
Pollack, Julien; Smith, Natalie; Hong, Wei-Ting
The primary purpose of this document is to help improve the consistency and understanding of Delivery Confidence Assessment (DCA) ratings for digital projects in Government. Specifically, this publication is intended to: &#13;
-	address the unique challenges and issues faced by digital projects&#13;
-	outline inputs and focus areas that assurance reviewers could use to determine DCA ratings&#13;
-	provide general tolerance levels for each rating category&#13;
-	uplift capability and understanding of DCA ratings for the people who use them, including Senior Responsible Owners (SROs) and steering committees&#13;
&#13;
This document was funded and co-designed with the Digital Transformation Agency, Australian Government.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sponsoring digitally-enabled transformation in Government: Lessons from sponsors of digitally-enabled transformations in NSW Government</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/32907" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Smith, Natalie</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cuganesan, Suresh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Howard, Mark</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ho, Jessica</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/32907</id>
<updated>2026-04-28T02:43:42Z</updated>
<published>2024-08-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Sponsoring digitally-enabled transformation in Government: Lessons from sponsors of digitally-enabled transformations in NSW Government
Smith, Natalie; Cuganesan, Suresh; Howard, Mark; Ho, Jessica
Governments have never been asked to do so much - to deliver more, and&#13;
better, for less. To meet this challenge, all governments must transform their&#13;
services and their operations. Digital technologies, including AI, can help&#13;
improve government services by delivering better services and making people's&#13;
lives easier and more flexible. However, there are significant challenges: legacy&#13;
systems, budget constraints, and large procurement exercises, protecting data,&#13;
ensuring cybersecurity, and responsibly deploying AI while considering&#13;
interoperable systems and delivering sustainable operating models.&#13;
&#13;
As an accountable program or project sponsor, you play a critical role in driving&#13;
these improvements, navigating the challenges and mitigating the risks. Our&#13;
role at Digital.NSW is to support you on this journey. That is why we&#13;
commissioned this work with the John Grill Institute for Project Leadership.&#13;
Our aim is to provide guidance to government executives like you, who are&#13;
accountable for sponsorship of a digitally- enabled transformation.&#13;
The report combines 1) practical advice from executives who have been&#13;
sponsors, 2) learnings from the Digital Strategy, Investment and Assurance&#13;
group who have oversight of all large digital- enabled investments in NSW&#13;
Government, and 3) the latest research from our partner, the John Grill&#13;
Institute for Project Leadership (University of Sydney).&#13;
&#13;
The frank insights and practical guidance this report provides might surprise&#13;
you. The recommendations do not require advanced qualifications in digital&#13;
technologies or seem particularly radical or complicated. Do not let this lull&#13;
you into a false sense of security. What we have found is that to successfully&#13;
sponsor digitally- enabled transformation requires a mindset shift from how we&#13;
have previously implemented projects. These are not just 'IT projects'. They&#13;
are a new way of delivering government services which require championing&#13;
change and navigating the complex landscape of cross- agency coordination.&#13;
We have found it requires collective leadership, not solo superheroes. As well&#13;
as the steering committee meetings, it requires proactive engagement with&#13;
vendors and the people impacted by the change. It is not a slavish adherence&#13;
to process, but a role that requires judgement and discernment, to hold the&#13;
course but adapting to ensure value is optimised and negative impact is&#13;
minimised.&#13;
&#13;
The challenges can seem overwhelming, and we are all too familiar with what&#13;
happens when digital projects fail. However, we can attest that when project&#13;
sponsors get it right, the prize is incredibly satisfying, not just for them, but also&#13;
for their consumers and clients and internal and external stakeholders. We&#13;
hope this report empowers and excites you with the critical role sponsorship&#13;
plays in delivering innovative solutions and improved service to our customers.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-08-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
