https://hdl.handle.net/2123/23688 2026-06-15T14:42:34Z 2026-06-15T14:42:34Z Fryer, Daniel Lees https://hdl.handle.net/2123/23691 2020-10-28T22:14:18Z 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z

Grieg in the henhouse: 12 seconds at the contested intersections of human and nonhuman animal interests Fryer, Daniel Lees Opening shot: interior, henhouse, low light, hens, two rows of perches and nest boxes. Voiceover, subtitle: ‘That’s why we play music’. Close-up of human hand flicking switch and turning dial on old radio. Cue music: Edvard Grieg’s ‘Morning Mood’. Close-up of hens. Wider frame, man walks slowly between perches and nest boxes. Voiceover, subtitle: ‘They become calm. They enjoy themselves.’ Close-up of single hen shaking feathers. Low-angle shot, hens, man by open door, daylight. Man speaks, subtitle: ‘Ba-pa-pa-pa!’ Fade to black. Caption, white on black, top of frame: ‘GOOD TASTE WITH A CLEAR CONSCIENCE.’ [Producer name], white on black, middle. Green logo, ‘organic’, lower right. Ends.

2020-01-01T00:00:00Z Hannan, Jason https://hdl.handle.net/2123/23690 2020-10-27T03:54:07Z 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z

Meatsplaining: The Animal Agriculture Industry and the Rhetoric of Denial [Front Matter] Hannan, Jason The animal agriculture industry, like other profit-driven industries, aggressively seeks to shield itself from public scrutiny. To that end, it uses a distinct set of rhetorical strategies to deflect criticism. These tactics are fundamental to modern animal agriculture but have long evaded critical analysis. In this collection, academic and activist contributors investigate the many forms of denialism perpetuated by the animal agriculture industry. What strategies does the industry use to avoid questions about its inhumane treatment of animals and its impact on the environment and public health? What narratives, myths and fantasies does it promote to sustain its image in the public imagination?

2020-01-01T00:00:00Z