<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Markets, rights and power in Australian social policy</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14775" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14775</id>
<updated>2026-06-13T23:37:57Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-06-13T23:37:57Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>'Which bank?' Competition and community service obligations in the retail banking sector</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14784" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cutcher, Leanne</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Loibl, Johann</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14784</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:50Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">'Which bank?' Competition and community service obligations in the retail banking sector
Cutcher, Leanne; Loibl, Johann
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Community aged care providers in a competitive environment: past, present and future</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14783" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Davidson, Bob</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14783</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:47Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Community aged care providers in a competitive environment: past, present and future
Davidson, Bob
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Marketisation of immigrant skills assessment in Australia</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14780" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Boucher, Anna</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14780</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:50Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Marketisation of immigrant skills assessment in Australia
Boucher, Anna
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Markets in education: 'School choice' and family capital.</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14779" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Proctor, Helen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Aitchison, Claire</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14779</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:52Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Markets in education: 'School choice' and family capital.
Proctor, Helen; Aitchison, Claire
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The devil's in the detail: the hidden costs of private retirement incomes policy</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14786" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stebbing, Adam</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14786</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:54Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The devil's in the detail: the hidden costs of private retirement incomes policy
Stebbing, Adam
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The politics of market encroachment: policymaker rationales and voter responses</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14788" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Meagher, Gabrielle</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Wilson, Shaun</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14788</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:54Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The politics of market encroachment: policymaker rationales and voter responses
Meagher, Gabrielle; Wilson, Shaun
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Conditional income transfers and choice in social services: just more conditions and more markets?</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14778" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Carney, Terry</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14778</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:46Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Conditional income transfers and choice in social services: just more conditions and more markets?
Carney, Terry
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Introduction: capturing marketisation in Australian social policy</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14789" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Meagher, Gabrielle</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Goodwin, Susan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14789</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:46Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Introduction: capturing marketisation in Australian social policy
Meagher, Gabrielle; Goodwin, Susan
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Money and markets in Australia's healthcare system</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14781" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Collyer, Fran</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Harley, Kirsten</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Short, Stephanie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14781</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:44Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Money and markets in Australia's healthcare system
Collyer, Fran; Harley, Kirsten; Short, Stephanie
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The marketisation of human services and the expansion of the not-for-profit sector</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14787" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Goodwin, Susan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Phillips, Ruth</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14787</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:45Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The marketisation of human services and the expansion of the not-for-profit sector
Goodwin, Susan; Phillips, Ruth
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>About the contributors and end pages</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14777" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Meagher, Gabrielle</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Goodwin, Susan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14777</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:05:01Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">About the contributors and end pages
Meagher, Gabrielle; Goodwin, Susan
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers.  Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Social benefit bonds: financial markets inside the state</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14785" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mitropoulos, Angela</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bryan, Dick</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14785</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:05:01Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Social benefit bonds: financial markets inside the state
Mitropoulos, Angela; Bryan, Dick
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Front Matter</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14790" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14790</id>
<updated>2025-10-20T00:04:52Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Front Matter
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Home security: marketisation and the changing face of housing assistance in Australia</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14782" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Groenhart, Lucy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gurran, Nicole</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/2123/14782</id>
<updated>2026-05-05T01:00:47Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Home security: marketisation and the changing face of housing assistance in Australia
Groenhart, Lucy; Gurran, Nicole
The provision of social services in Australia has changed dramatically in recent decades. Governments have expanded social provision without expanding the public sector by directly subsidising private provision, by contracting private agencies, both non-profit and for-profit, to deliver services, and through a number of other subsidies and vouchers. Private actors receive public funds to deliver social services to citizens, raising a range of important questions about financial and democratic accountability: 'who benefits', 'who suffers' and 'who decides'. This book explores these developments through rich case studies of a diverse set of social policy domains. The case studies demonstrate a range of effects of marketisation, including the impact on the experience of consumer engagement with social service systems, on the distribution of social advantage and disadvantage, and on the democratic steering of social policy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
