Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2123/5811
|
| Title: | Phrenologyand the Insanity Defence: Medical Jurisprudence in the McNaughtan Trial |
| Authors: | Varley, Matthew Department of History |
| Keywords: | Phrenology, Nineteenth Century medicine |
| Issue Date: | 2008 |
| Abstract: | This thesis argues that phrenology shaped the defence argument in the McNaughtan trial. The role of this now-discredited science exemplifies the negotiation of scientific, legal and lay knowledge in the early nineteenth century, at a time when science was challenging the primacy of lay understandings of insanity. Phrenological ideas allowed the defence to privilege medical opinion over lay opinion, and propose a model of the mind that could account for McNaughtan’s insanity. This was possible because the medical and professional communities accepted some elements of the science. They applied these principles when explaining and verifying insanity in a courtroom setting. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2123/5811 |
| Department/Unit/Centre: | Department of History |
| Appears in Collections: | Honours Theses - Department of History |
Files in This Item:
|
Items in Sydney eScholarship Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.