Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Moral reasoning of adolescent male offenders: Comparison of sexual and nonsexual offenders|
|Authors:||Ashkar, Peter J|
Kenny, Dianna T
Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health
|Citation:||Ashkar, P. J., & Kenny, D. T. (2007). Moral reasoning of adolescent male offenders: Comparison of sexual and nonsexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 108-118. The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Criminal Justice and Behavior, vol. 34, Jan 2007 by SAGE Publications Ltd, All rights reserved. © 2007.|
|Abstract:||This study compared the moral reasoning abilities of juvenile sex and non-sex offenders using a novel methodology that explored their responses to moral questions in a variety of offending contexts. Seven sexual and nine nonsexual adolescent male offenders from a maximum security detention facility in New South Wales, Australia, were presented with a variety of hypothetical offending situations involving sexual and non sexual offences and asked to discuss these. It was hypothesised that the quality of moral reasoning employed by offenders would be impaired in those offending contexts in which they had prior experience. Responses were assessed using a modified version of the Moral Judgment Interview Standard Issue Scoring Manual (MJI; Colby & Kohlberg, 1987). Assigned levels of moral reasoning ability were verified independently by two expert raters. Responses by sexual offenders in sexual offending contexts and by nonsexual offenders in nonsexual offending contexts were dominated by preconventional reasoning. Both groups employed a greater use of conventional reasoning in non-congruent offending contexts.|
|Department/Unit/Centre:||Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health|
|Type of Work:||Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Research Papers and Publications. Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health|
This work is protected by Copyright. All rights reserved. Access to this work is provided for the purposes of personal research and study. Except where permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, this work must not be copied or communicated to others without the express permission of the copyright owner. Use the persistent URI in this record to enable others to access this work.
|DT-Kenny-2007-Moral.pdf||152.32 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in Sydney eScholarship Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.