<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Sydney eScholarship Collection: Working Papers</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/769</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Ordinary People</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/1208</link>
      <description>Title: Ordinary People&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Brett, Judith&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Judith Brett talking about the class dimensions of her Ordinary People research&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Description: Monday 30 October 2006</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Post-Colonial Comment on Collins</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/900</link>
      <description>Title: A Post-Colonial Comment on Collins&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Clegg, Stewart; van Krieken, Robert&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This paper responds to Randall Collins' critique of R.W. Connell's 1997 paper, 'Why is classical theory classical' arguing that the the history of the discipline should in fact be redrawn.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 03:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

