<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2123/6342">
    <title>Sydney eScholarship Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/6342</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2123/8973" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2123/8689" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T14:14:53Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2123/8973">
    <title>Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise Of 8 Beaches In Shoalhaven: A New Multi-Dimensional Assessment Methodology</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/8973</link>
    <description>Title: Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise Of 8 Beaches In Shoalhaven: A New Multi-Dimensional Assessment Methodology
Authors: Tonmoy, Fahim; El-Zein, Abbas; Ghetti, Isabelle; Massie, Ray
Abstract: Coastal councils around the world are likely to be affected by future climatic impacts such&#xD;
as sea level rise and extreme flooding. Shoalhaven City Council is responsible for the&#xD;
sustainable management of 165 kilometres of open coast, the longest of any local&#xD;
government area in New South Wales. In order to prepare a comprehensive coastal zone&#xD;
management plan, Council investigated present and expected future coastal risks on its&#xD;
beaches. Detailed studies identified eight beaches where coastal hazards would&#xD;
significantly impact private properties and public assets. In order to help decision-makers&#xD;
in prioritising management actions for the eight areas, an analytical tool is needed that&#xD;
would not only quantify the physical risks to infrastructure but would also be able to&#xD;
integrate social and environmental considerations towards a holistic assessment of the&#xD;
vulnerability of each beach area.&#xD;
Following the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conceptualisation, the&#xD;
vulnerability of a community to a climate hazard can be seen as determined by the degree&#xD;
of physical exposure to the hazard, as well as the community’s sensitivity to its impacts&#xD;
and its ability to cope with, or adapt to, these impacts. Hence, vulnerability assessment&#xD;
presents a number of theoretical and methodological challenges, the most important of&#xD;
which are epitomized by the following questions:&#xD;
1. how to determine, say whether a community with high exposure and high adaptive&#xD;
capacity is more vulnerable or less vulnerable than a community with lower exposure but&#xD;
lower adaptive capacity? (problem of compensation).&#xD;
2. how to incorporate the imprecision and value-judgments inevitably present in multistakeholder&#xD;
vulnerability assessments while maintaining a consistent and robust scientific&#xD;
process? (problem of fuzziness).&#xD;
A new methodology has been developed at the University of Sydney that addresses these&#xD;
questions and offers a clear and consistent approach for conducting vulnerability&#xD;
assessments. The paper describes the application of this methodology to the ranking of&#xD;
vulnerabilities to sea level rise of eight beaches in Shoalhaven.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2123/8689">
    <title>Design Capability Report</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/8689</link>
    <description>Title: Design Capability Report
Authors: Dong, Andy; Kvan, Tom; Sarkar, Somwrita; Nichols, Crighton
Abstract: This spreadsheet contains the reporting instrument for the Design Capability Report (DCR). The DCR serves as the informational basis for the assessment of government policy and practices toward participatory design.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-10-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

