<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Sydney eScholarship Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2123/769" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/769</id>
  <updated>2013-05-21T19:16:37Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-21T19:16:37Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Ordinary People</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2123/1208" />
    <author>
      <name>Brett, Judith</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/1208</id>
    <updated>2006-10-30T23:19:25Z</updated>
    <published>2006-10-30T23:19:24Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Ordinary People
Authors: Brett, Judith
Abstract: Judith Brett talking about the class dimensions of her Ordinary People research
Description: Monday 30 October 2006</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-10-30T23:19:24Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Post-Colonial Comment on Collins</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2123/900" />
    <author>
      <name>Clegg, Stewart</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>van Krieken, Robert</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2123/900</id>
    <updated>2008-06-17T12:01:52Z</updated>
    <published>2006-05-05T03:19:25Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A Post-Colonial Comment on Collins
Authors: Clegg, Stewart; van Krieken, Robert
Abstract: This paper responds to Randall Collins' critique of R.W. Connell's 1997 paper, 'Why is classical theory classical' arguing that the the history of the discipline should in fact be redrawn.</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-05-05T03:19:25Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

